Good advice

Ruling: Tenants must pay for monitoring waste separation 

Tenants must pay for monitoring the correct separation of waste. This is the result of a ruling by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH; AZ: ZR 117/21). In the case in question, a residential real estate company in Berlin had passed on the costs of waste separation and smoke detector maintenance to its tenants. The tenants objected to the statement of operating costs and demanded a refund.

BGH: Adjustment of the deposit settlement period possible 

In future, landlords will be able to retain the deposit for longer than six months in the event of damage. This is the case if damage has occurred to the rented property and the landlord could have asserted the claim for damages before the expiry of the so-called "six-month limitation period". The landlord must also be able to prove the damage. The Federal Court of Justice has...

Speculation period: cheating does not apply 

The ten-year speculation period for profits from property sales also applies if family members use the property. This has been clarified by the Federal Fiscal Court (AZ: IX R 13/23). A married couple from North Rhine-Westphalia had tried to avoid income tax by letting their mother-in-law live in the property free of charge. The court confirmed that this use did not qualify as...

Subletting: Illegal recordings inadmissible as evidence 

Video recordings made in the stairwell without the tenants' knowledge may not be used as evidence in court proceedings. This is a clear violation of data protection and the tenants' personal rights. This was recently decided by the Federal Court of Justice (case reference: VI ZR 1370/20). In the case in question, a Berlin housing company had hired a private investigator...

Property tax: Objection possible in the event of overvaluation 

Property owners can appeal against property tax values that are set too high. If the property tax values set by the tax office appear unrealistic, they must be given the opportunity to appeal. This is always the case if owners can credibly demonstrate an overvaluation of at least 40 percent. This was recently decided by the Federal Fiscal Court (BFH). In two...

Neighborhood dispute: Tit for tat 

Hedge owners whose own plants also exceed the statutory heights may not assert any reduction claims against their neighbors. This is the result of a ruling by the Frankenthal Regional Court (AZ: 2 S 85/23). In this case, this legal principle was applied due to a dispute between two neighbors in Ludwigshafen who both had hedges that were too high. One...

Resolutions: Effective even without concrete figures 

Resolutions on the levying of a special contribution are valid even if they do not state the exact amount. However, owners must be able to calculate this themselves. This was recently decided by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH; V ZR 132/23). In this case, a community of condominium owners wanted to conduct a lawsuit. The owners decided with...

Building inspection: Tips for private builders 

Building acceptance is a crucial step for private building owners - it signals that the building has been completed. However, experience shows that hardly any new builds are accepted without defects. For this reason, the Association of Private Building Owners (VPB) recommends that independent experts be consulted during the acceptance process in order to identify possible defects. A formal building inspection is advisable and should...

Ruling: Landlords get more rights for termination for personal use 

The position of landlords in the event of terminations for personal use has been strengthened by a recent ruling by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH). The BGH ruled that landlords who want to use some of their rented apartments for professional purposes can claim this under simplified conditions. To do so, they only need to prove a notable disadvantage that would arise if the apartment were not occupied...

Building acceptance: rights and deadlines 

Building owners have a period of five years after building acceptance to assert claims for defects. This warranty period allows builders to demand rectification in the event of defects that are attributable to planning or execution errors. Even if almost five years have already passed since acceptance and moving in, the construction company must still pay the costs for...

Compare listings

Compare
en_USEnglish